Jan
23
Wikipedia Snubs Contributors
Posted by Sara
Everyone is talking about it, so I might as well too. I think it is utter crap that Wikipedia has decided to implement the rel=nofollow tag in its articles. They raised over $1 million in their yearly fundraising efforts, surely they can give their contributors the chance to link to their personal sites. I think this is going to backfire on them. A big reason they get so many quality contributions is because, yes, contributors used to get something out of it aside from just doing something for the good of it. Yes, sometimes we can be generous with our time, but lets show some appreciation and let our links stand.
People are already starting to put nofollow in their links to wikipedia. Eventually, this will probably hurt them to some degree. I know they are trying to combat spam, even the creator of wordpress says that when they added them to the software it didn’t really have an effect in the long run.
I think contributing is very similar to volunteer work. You initially get involved becuase it feels good to do the right thing. But in organizations, you get to meet other people, make contacts, make friends, etc. You have a chance to gain something from your volunteer work or in the long run, would you continue volunteering when your efforts went unappreciated? What do you think? Do you contribute just for the satisfaction of doing something nice?

